Review




Structured Review

AAT Bioquest fluorogenic substrate gly-pro-amc
Fluorogenic Substrate Gly Pro Amc, supplied by AAT Bioquest, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic substrate gly-pro-amc/product/AAT Bioquest
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate gly-pro-amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

97
Thermo Fisher fluorogenic pop substrate suc gly pro leu gly pro 7 amido 4methylcoumarin amc
Fluorogenic Pop Substrate Suc Gly Pro Leu Gly Pro 7 Amido 4methylcoumarin Amc, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic pop substrate suc gly pro leu gly pro 7 amido 4methylcoumarin amc/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic pop substrate suc gly pro leu gly pro 7 amido 4methylcoumarin amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
MedChemExpress fluorogenic fap substrate
Fluorogenic Fap Substrate, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic fap substrate/product/MedChemExpress
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic fap substrate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly proamc
Fluorogenic Tripeptide Substrate H Met Gly Proamc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly proamc/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly proamc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly pro amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Tripeptide Substrate H Met Gly Pro Amc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly pro amc/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic tripeptide substrate h met gly pro amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems h met gly pro 7 amino 4 methylcoumarin hydrochloride
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
H Met Gly Pro 7 Amino 4 Methylcoumarin Hydrochloride, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/h met gly pro 7 amino 4 methylcoumarin hydrochloride/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
h met gly pro 7 amino 4 methylcoumarin hydrochloride - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Thermo Fisher fluorogenic pop substrate suc gly pro leu gly pro 7 amido 4 methylcoumarin amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Pop Substrate Suc Gly Pro Leu Gly Pro 7 Amido 4 Methylcoumarin Amc, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic pop substrate suc gly pro leu gly pro 7 amido 4 methylcoumarin amc/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic pop substrate suc gly pro leu gly pro 7 amido 4 methylcoumarin amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bachem cathepsin-specific fluorogenic substrate z-gly-pro-arg-amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Cathepsin Specific Fluorogenic Substrate Z Gly Pro Arg Amc, supplied by Bachem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cathepsin-specific fluorogenic substrate z-gly-pro-arg-amc/product/Bachem
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cathepsin-specific fluorogenic substrate z-gly-pro-arg-amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
AAT Bioquest fluorogenic substrate gly-pro-amc
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fluorogenic Substrate Gly Pro Amc, supplied by AAT Bioquest, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluorogenic substrate gly-pro-amc/product/AAT Bioquest
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluorogenic substrate gly-pro-amc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems peptide substrate cleavage assay
Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the <t>fluorogenic</t> <t>tripeptide</t> <t>substrate</t> <t>H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC</t> was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Peptide Substrate Cleavage Assay, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/peptide substrate cleavage assay/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
peptide substrate cleavage assay - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the fluorogenic tripeptide substrate H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Journal: Febs Letters

Article Title: The Caenorhabditis elegans DPF ‐3 and human DPP4 have tripeptidyl peptidase activity

doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.70219

Figure Lengend Snippet: Enzyme activity profiles of DPPIV family proteases. (A) To compare the peptidase activities of hDPP4, hDPP9, C. elegans DPF‐3, and the catalytic mutant DPF‐3 (S784A), the fluorogenic tripeptide substrate H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC was used over a range of concentrations (0.5–64 μ m ). hDPP4 displayed robust, concentration‐dependent activity, reaching 100% normalized fluorescence at 64 μ m substrate. In contrast, wild‐type DPF‐3 showed substantially lower activity, achieving only ~25% of the maximal signal at the highest substrate concentration. hDPP9 activity was negligible under these conditions, and the S784A mutation abrogated DPF‐3 activity completely, confirming loss of catalytic function. (B, C) Michaelis–Menten analysis of DPF‐3 (B) and hDPP4 (C) revealed distinct kinetic parameters. Nonlinear regression yielded for DPF‐3 a V max of 33 193 AU min −1 and a K m of 245.6 μ m . hDPP4 exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency, with V max = 56 027 AU min −1 and K m = 461.5 μ m . The higher V max of hDPP4, despite its higher K m , underscores its greater turnover capacity on this substrate. (D, E) Dose–response curves for the hDPP8/9 inhibitor 1G244 and the hDPP4 inhibitor vildagliptin were generated against DPF‐3 and hDPP4 using substrate concentrations near each enzyme's K m . For DPF‐3, 1G244 inhibited activity with an IC 50 = 499.5 n m , whereas vildagliptin was more potent (IC 50 = 142.1 n m ) (D). DPP4 was more sensitive to both 1G244 (IC 50 = 43.3 n m ) and vildagliptin (IC 50 = 14.8 n m ) (E), indicating differential inhibitor specificities within the DPPIV family. Each graph represents the mean data from triplicate experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Article Snippet: Enzymatic activities of hDPP4 and DPF‐3 were measured using the fluorogenic tripeptide substrate H‐Met‐Gly‐Pro‐AMC (7‐amino‐4‐methylcoumarin, Catalog number: ES017, R&D Systems).

Techniques: Activity Assay, Mutagenesis, Concentration Assay, Fluorescence, Generated, Standard Deviation